Coming Soon
OCCUPIED CINEMA
2018
Director
Senka Domanović
Starring
Zvezda Occupation
Runtime
87 minutes
Select Showtime to Purchase Tickets
Select Showtimes
FREE SCREENING! NO RSVP, JUST COME OUT. DOORS OPEN 30 MIN BEFORE SHOWTIME.
In November 2014, a group of young filmmakers, together with political activists, former cinema employees and enthusiasts, violently entered the abandoned, privatized and intentionally destroyed cinema Zvezda in Belgrade.
“Every time I watch Senka Domanović’s brilliant doc about the occupation of the Zvezda cinema that I was an active participant in, I start thinking about why that occupation was such a huge event in Serbian cultural and political history in the 2010s. What triggered such a reaction from the public? For three months, a number of Serbian – and international – politicians, journalists, filmmakers, all had something to say about it. But a group of activists occupied a ruined cinema? So what? Zvezda was so special because that Belgrade movie theatre had become a symbol of the devastating effects of the transition to capitalism in Serbia. It triggered people’s anger against the crimes of privatization, the brutal sellout of the socially owned enterprises that left thousands unemployed, poor and hopeless. It was a statement that the promises of a wonderful future on the free market were lies – and that we have to do something about it.
OCCUPIED CINEMA captures that anger, but also the desire of students, filmmakers, workers and leftist activists to organize and create a better alternative, at least in the movie theatre, while at the same time reflecting upon why they failed to succeed. The movie plays out like a curious combination of Godard’s LA CHINOISE and Barbara Kopple’s HARLAN COUNTY, USA. Observational segments, shot in real-time with a moving and dynamic camera, are juxtaposed with interviews with the activists. In that way, the movie shows and tells: we see the dreams and realities of the activists, their misunderstandings and conflicts, we follow closely the breakup of the group, and see different characters reflecting on their roles in the plot. The film can be read as an allegory for every futile collective effort, or for every revolution that eats its own children. And that’s actually my logline for OCCUPIED CINEMA: Film is politics; cinema is society.” - Ivan Velisavljević Film archivist, curator and critic
DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT: “It is commonly held that we are living in times where people have lost their trust in institutions and the state. The occupation of the cinema was a opportunity for people to come together, to self-organize and manage a contained micro economy essentially bypassing the market logic and break away from the ideological apparatus of the state. There we had a rare gathering of artists, activists, former cinema employees, standing up together against the injustice -- and moment later everything collapsed. My film is an attempt to understand this transformation. In terms of style, ethics and production, this film relies on the cinéma vérité method. OCCUPIED CINEMA, as an investigative documentary, putting things in medias res. The camera doesn’t hide its presence, it invites movement members as well as the cinema goers to a dialogue.”
In November 2014, a group of young filmmakers, together with political activists, former cinema employees and enthusiasts, violently entered the abandoned, privatized and intentionally destroyed cinema Zvezda in Belgrade.
“Every time I watch Senka Domanović’s brilliant doc about the occupation of the Zvezda cinema that I was an active participant in, I start thinking about why that occupation was such a huge event in Serbian cultural and political history in the 2010s. What triggered such a reaction from the public? For three months, a number of Serbian – and international – politicians, journalists, filmmakers, all had something to say about it. But a group of activists occupied a ruined cinema? So what? Zvezda was so special because that Belgrade movie theatre had become a symbol of the devastating effects of the transition to capitalism in Serbia. It triggered people’s anger against the crimes of privatization, the brutal sellout of the socially owned enterprises that left thousands unemployed, poor and hopeless. It was a statement that the promises of a wonderful future on the free market were lies – and that we have to do something about it.
OCCUPIED CINEMA captures that anger, but also the desire of students, filmmakers, workers and leftist activists to organize and create a better alternative, at least in the movie theatre, while at the same time reflecting upon why they failed to succeed. The movie plays out like a curious combination of Godard’s LA CHINOISE and Barbara Kopple’s HARLAN COUNTY, USA. Observational segments, shot in real-time with a moving and dynamic camera, are juxtaposed with interviews with the activists. In that way, the movie shows and tells: we see the dreams and realities of the activists, their misunderstandings and conflicts, we follow closely the breakup of the group, and see different characters reflecting on their roles in the plot. The film can be read as an allegory for every futile collective effort, or for every revolution that eats its own children. And that’s actually my logline for OCCUPIED CINEMA: Film is politics; cinema is society.” - Ivan Velisavljević Film archivist, curator and critic
DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT: “It is commonly held that we are living in times where people have lost their trust in institutions and the state. The occupation of the cinema was a opportunity for people to come together, to self-organize and manage a contained micro economy essentially bypassing the market logic and break away from the ideological apparatus of the state. There we had a rare gathering of artists, activists, former cinema employees, standing up together against the injustice -- and moment later everything collapsed. My film is an attempt to understand this transformation. In terms of style, ethics and production, this film relies on the cinéma vérité method. OCCUPIED CINEMA, as an investigative documentary, putting things in medias res. The camera doesn’t hide its presence, it invites movement members as well as the cinema goers to a dialogue.”